HOME | QUOTE REQUEST | ADVISOR TOOLS | ||||||||||||||
Who Are the Real Beneficiaries of LTCi?When a loved one needs long term care and their plan was “failing to plan,” it is often family members, neighbors, and friends who take on the role of caregiver. Whether they provide part-time care or full-time, caregiving takes a tremendous toll -- emotionally, physically, and financially. We have found that most people who purchase long term care insurance have one goal in common (besides the financial aspect): to avoid being a burden on their loved ones. Here’s why: About caregivers:
Financial toll on caregivers:
Physical toll on caregivers:
The costs to caregivers:
But with a long term care insurance policy in place, instead of caregiver these family members, neighbors, and friends can remain family members, neighbors, and friends. A long term care insurance policy can also:
Then there’s also the legal aspect of long term care to consider. Did you know there are filial support laws on the books in 30 states*? These laws obligate certain family members to care for and maintain or financially assist indigent family members. Typically it’s adult children supporting parents, but oftentimes it’s the reverse: parents being required to support adult children. In some states, only the family members themselves can file a claim. In other states, the county, state public agencies, or creditors can file the lawsuit. In some states, criminal penalties may be imposed. And some states even allow both civil and criminal penalties. In those states where you could be held civilly responsible, a judgment against you could result in your wages being garnished or liens being placed against your property. Filial support laws have a retroactive application of liability and, unlike child support laws where you have clear numbers in advance, there are no guidelines in place. Take the 2012 case of John Pittas, a 47-year-old restaurant owner who was sued by a nursing home company for $93,000 in expenses incurred by his mother over a six month period after she was denied Medicaid eligibility. The Superior Court of Pennsylvania (Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America v. Pittas Pa. Super. Ct., No. 536 EDA 2011, May 7, 2012) found in favor of the nursing home based on filial responsibility law, and the son was forced to re-pay the entire costs for his mother’s care. The court finding even granted discretion to the nursing home company to seek payment from any family members it wished to pursue. Until recently, these statutes have largely been ignored. However, the Pittas court decision, along with several others, indicates there might be renewed interest in enforcing them. And with long term care costs on the rise, Americans living longer, and funding sources under pressure, nursing homes and other health care providers may have more incentive to compel family members to either help financially or be at risk for covering the cost of care. As more of the Baby Boomer generation reaches their golden years, and as many nursing homes and local governments are faced with providing care to a growing number of indigent elderly patients, there’s a real possibility other states may begin enforcing their filial support statutes in an attempt to find another way to fund a family member’s nursing home bill. *Alaska, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Puerto Rico
Copyright © 2014 Low Load Insurance Services, Inc. Contents may not be copied, reproduced or redistributed without prior written permission of |
|